Goodbye Chunky Rice

Month

February 2011

12 posts

The Death Of Facebook

doubleclue:

So I’ve managed to yet again stay up all night (fuck you wind, with your incessant nagging), and have been contemplating this for a while. It’s now 9am and instead of attempting to actually get some sleep, which I desperately need considering I’m starting to feel ill, I’m just gonna try and write some shit instead. So here we go:

I miss Myspace. Seriously. I absolutely loved it, and nothing online has really been the same, which I used to think was great becaue I went along with this whole “its just evolution, we adapt to new technologies”. And now I realise it’s just bullshit. Myspace was MY space, where I could come online, meet new people and have interesting conversations. And then facebook came along and ruined everything.

The great thing about Myspace was that in a way it was anonymous. Sure, you could put you’re name on it if you wanted, but you didnt have to. There was nothing stopping you calling yourself “Dickflaps McGee” and putting your profile picture as a horse getting sucked off by a turtle, but for me, that wasn’t what it was about. Sure, I created a projection for myself, and only uploaded photos in which I thought I looked best. I was a fat bastard back then, it was the done thing. But that was the thing, as someone who had a tough time socialising, myspace was somewhere I could reinvent myself, and find some new awesome people (some of whom I still talk to today).

Read More

I liked this, and relate a lot to the etiquette of it all and the shame as I ignore friend requests. A part of what I dislike is that people are naturally different in different settings, Family Reuben is different to Medic Reuben is different to the Reuben I want friends to be, my house mate has 2 accounts, none of which are in his real name, and for separate groups of people he doesn’t want to cross over (he also masqueraded as someone entirely different for 3 months to highlight privacy issues) and he seems to have the right idea. 

Feb 7, 20115 notes

January 2011

3 posts

Jan 20, 201133 notes
Giraffe workers.

inheritedstamps:

I’ve already talked about the 14th July revolution and its 1st anniversary commemorative stamp. This is the another in the set. While the other showed revolutionaries, this one shows a worker with a really long neck. I have no idea why.

This is a thing I do now.

Jan 14, 20111 note
Jan 14, 2011

December 2010

4 posts

Inside and opinions on kettles.

[an edited version is going to IC Felix]

Last Thursday was the vote on raising tuition fee cap to £9000 and making the standard £6000, unsurprisingly this caused protests to form on the day. I have been on some of the ones before and while so far I have only been kettled momentarily, I went prepared for being kettled. I took warm clothes, water and had pulled an all-nighter the night before to finish an essay so I was able to submit it before I went on the protest, how sad. Sad that I went to peacefully protest in Westminster Square and expected to have police surround the protest and keep it there for hours.

On my cycle in I passed major traffic delays on the South Bank with reams of police vans and a couple of fire engines forcing their way through. I met some friends and crossed Westminster Bridge to meet the first police line blocking the entrance into the square, we took a side street onto Whitehall. Being late, we looked left and right and thought there seemed to be more people in Westminster Square so walked there, as I entered the square I passed Jody McIntyre, he didn’t look very angry or aggressive and had he not been pulled from his wheelchair later on I wouldn’t have noted any significance to this. The metal barriers onto the square itself had been pulled down and we walked onto the square for the first time since the Democracy Village essentially made it a no-go area for other protests and subsequent repair works needed to be done. Westminster square has always been the obvious location for a protest against something occurring in Parliament, and as that was where the vote was being held I felt it the place to stay and make my voice heard. Previous protests had deviated from the official route so it seemed fine. At that time, the crowd was largely peaceful, some people were dancing to sound systems, a few fires had been lit, but mainly people were milling about, talking to each other, passing leaflets and occasionally a chant would rise up. As protests go, it was fairly tame. A little later something occurred on the North Western corner and a lot of people seemed to be clashing with police, we went over to chant and see what was going on. The metal barriers that had previously lined the square were hoisted above the crowd and pushed forward towards the police. Shortly after the line of the police ran to the sides and mounted police charged the crowd causing most people to run backwards, the only other times I’ve been as terrified was when I in a crowd in East Jerusalem which was rushed by Israeli police and landing in Colombo airport when people thought Tamil Tigers were bombing it. The horses were pushed back and a few protesters came out with blood on their face and one girl appeared unconscious. The violence calmed down and the crowd largely moved to another corner of the square. The next few hours passed largely with nothing much happening, we heard talk that on Whitehall protesters were taking a beating from police. We decided to leave the square around 4pm to go to the NUS vigil on embankment, because hearing speeches are good, we went to a police line were politely informed we weren’t being allowed out.  I’m not sure when the containment officially began, but it would be another 5 hours until I left the square and 2 after that that I would be allowed out of the kettle.

At this time, nothing was going on, we stood by a fire to warm our feet and added the wood from our placard, occasionally the helicopters would shine the light on us, and we tried to explain to some of the younger protesters that putting a pile of jeans on the fire probably wasn’t the best idea to stay warm. At 6 we were largely bored, the vote had been passed, as it was predicted, but by only 20 votes and with the concessions made earlier in the week on part-time students and the threshold of starting repayments, so I’d argue that the student campaigning and protests had had an effect, a part of me thought that the Black Bloc components would be ignited by the announcement, but they weren’t, and the attitude on the ground was largely despondent. If the the police had let people out at that point, I’m fairly certain people would have filtered out reasonably quickly, with some polite encouragement people would have left and would have started plans on the next action. But no, the kettle remained intact. I’ve never understood the rationale behind kettling, I’ve guessed its to keep people in one place until they wear themselves out and then go away, and it also works well in turning groups amongst each other as they get more grumpy at being stuck together but at the time however, not much was going on that needed to be resolved and just smacked of lazy policing. To those who have postulated that the student riots have somehow been organised, I really didn’t think so, people knew the HMRC was on the corner for hours, and had sat in its windows and hung banners from it for much of the day. People who might be called ‘intent’ on causing damage were few in number and at any one time were only active in one corner of the square and largely nothing was going on.

Still there, around 7 someone through a bit of concrete at a window, it cracked. Soon after some more people through stuff,  the treasury was not surrounded and had the police wanted, they could have easily moved in and formed a line in front of it and probably arrest the person as the helicopter was hovering above with its light down on the people. They remained unmoved. A group at some point tried to break some doors down into the building, it took a good 20 minutes before they broke in, at this time the police appeared to be doing nothing, some entered the HMRC rooms to photo those trying to break the windows.  Eventually the crowd broke the door down and probably got a few feet inside before being beaten back by police inside, later a number of police charged through to break up the violence. At this time, the protesters were in 3 loose groups, one fighting the police, another watching, and another queueing to leave the square, I stood at the side and chanted with the others of the second group. Why didn’t I join in with the fighting? I was, and still am angry, and I think the students fighting  are in some ways right to be taking their anger out in physical ways, the petitions, letter and lobbying amounted to nothing, and under this country’s unfair electoral system despite a party pledging to vote against a raise in fees and having a manifesto with paragraphs wanting to abolish them altogether and gaining 23% of the vote, it only received 8% of the Parliamentary seats. Students have tried a lot of indirect action including making their voices heard at the ballot box, but these voices have been ignored by the institution meant to the represent them, its is only now that people are starting to take note of what people think about fees and while it is a shame this appears to correlate with the amount of damage being done, I am glad it is getting coverage. I didn’t join because I’m still scared, scared of getting hurt or being arrested, much better placed in trying to convince people through other means, but I empathise with those at the front. Yes I think burning of memorial benches and swinging off the Cenotaph is tasteless, but I don’t care that someone kicked a royal care. A group of people who get per head much more from the public coffers than the students on the street, and to hear that “great restraint was shown in them not being shot” is frankly ridiculous. But I didn’t see these things, nor did I see the beating of Jody McIntyre or Alfie Meadows, but I did see police continue to charge and rain batons down of the protesters near the front. More than once it seemed like the hundreds of riot police on the sidelines were about to make a charge for us, but as they slowly manoeuvred from one side of the square things seemed to quiet down slowly. Again the boredom of being kettled set in, and when we saw a group being escorted out we joined them. This was at around 8pm, an hour later and with under 16s, the old and the infirm being prioritised, I had moved forward but a few metres, the crowd was largely whining, with the odd chant of “if you think this illegal clap your hands”. It appeared the kettle was being released one protester at a time, and that each as being searched and photographed, people in the crowd confirmed with each other what is and isn’t allowed to be done by the police in this situation (must remove things covering your face, but can cover it with your hand, and to say no comment to any question, ensure you get receipts for the search), but largely I grew increasingly cold and irritated with the crowd around me. At no point had what was going on been explained to us, or how long we’d be kept longer, at one time a policeman stood up and said things were going as fast as possible, and joked at one point we would be moved into another kettle. It seemed a genuine joke which while received badly wasn’t to be believed. How wrong we were, at 9, the police lined right up to Westminster Bridge we were allowed to advance, to what we thought would be just being let go. As we passed Big Ben, for the first time in hours the group showed solidarity and began chanting, but it soon became apparent that we were just becoming a moving kettle with hundreds of police in front and behind. While I am aware of kettlings legality, I’ve never heard of police forcing people to march in such a way, other than in recounts of war crimes. What resulted was the entire protest being forced onto the much more exposed Westminster bridge, which was very low barriers, soon we were crammed in together with barely much room to move. I passed a woman having a panic attack who was trying to be calmed down by her friends, an old man was in near tears about the treatment, it seemed he has been near to people who had ended up urinating themselves. The entire day there had been no access to water, and while many people had relieved themselves on various buildings or barriers, there had been no sanitation provided, despite the MET pledging to do so more. There were still children in the crowd. While we chanted more, there was relatively little pushing or shoving. At some point a friend saw the police beat their way to get into the crowd to find a child who had collapsed, protesters raised their hands to show they had no intention of violence and were beaten back. Had we not been kettled onto the bridge with no means of spreading out, it would have been much easier, and in all likelihood the girl would have been moved forward. The beating police then formed a mini-line half way across the bridge, further confusing us as to where we were meant to go. Many people pleaded with the police to explain what was going, others argued one way or the other. People nearby tried to find in vain where their friend who had been arrested had been taken to. Tempers flared in the group as people tried to push forward. As we got to the front at around 11:30, we saw that the protesters were being funnelled into a single line queue down a long line of police to a single police photographer before walking past 30 or so other police.

I cannot understand that with several hundred armoured policeman, that the MET didn’t think to bring along more than one camera or photographer, it would have been easy to have two or three lines coming from the bridge, and had we not been moved from Parliament  they could have had one at each line (ie 5) if not more. So why were we kept for so long? Kettling causes people to lash out in frustration at being detained for so long, and garners support quickly in a crowd, while after a few hours of getting more and more annoyed at the situation, many people would have left the bridge more angry at the police than at their MPs. Being interned in such unpleasant conditions, in my opinion, was a deliberate attempt to grind down the protesters to stop them taking to the streets again. As only a minority were violent, this seems disproportionate and runs the risk of encouraging people to become more violent, I also feel that by highlighting the violent aspects of a protest without the context undermines the protest as a while.  I fear a lot of young people, for whom it might have been the first protests will think that all protests are violent, or as worse many will foster an anti-police attitude, and currently the MET are encouraging a lot of students and supporters to have a great mistrust of them. The fact that Theresa May has said water cannons wont be used is of little consolation in a week when a wheelchair bound man is pulled from it, and another person is beaten into needing neurosurgery, and many others beaten with everyone detained without reason or explanation for over 7 hours: had we been arrested our treatment would have been many times more humane. There must be an open inquirey into this last months events, and a judicial review of the use of kettling. The abuse of police injury statistics and internal inquiries may allow aspects to be brushed under the carpet and persons not brought to justice, the fact that police tried to divert ambulances from the nearest hospitals is very frightening and people must be made accountable for such decisions. I’ve heard people say they don’t  have time to get involved, remember a short e-mail to your MP is as useful as numbers on the street, but if you plan ahead, and get your work done, I’ll see you on the streets.

Dec 14, 20101 note
Why I blame the libdems:

I ran in the local elections in May for the Liberal Democrats, and lost to no-ones surprise. I am no longer a member, I gave them time after their coalition agreement to convince me that they hadn’t made a terrible decision. I knew the Lib Dems were never going to get an overall majority, and so my vote was in many ways a form of damage control, and when they started looking like they would do well, I hoped for a Lab-Lib coalition, I think it would have been brilliant. Towards the end, Labour were offering offering a referendum in 2010, and there rumours of it being passed without.  Had that happened it would have probably been the single best thing a minor partner could have hoped for, for a chance in the next election to have a better representation of the number of seats compared to their votes. As it stood, the Lib Dems got 23% of the vote and under our electoral system this equated to 8% of the parliamentary seats, 23% of the voting population agreed with their pledges and manifestos yet their opinions are essentially muffled. The coalition agreement was bad, wherever it said “the lib dems can abstain” it should have been a free vote, because now the few MPs they had were gagged to the point of being irrelevant.

Now I come to the recent so-called student riots, I am all for peaceful demonstration, I prefer letters, articles, blogs, petitions and lobbying, when I do take to the streets its more a show of solidarity and bolster my own spirits by seeing likeminded people, I think violence will turn more people away form a cause than gain them. Not that all direct action is violent, much is awe inspiring, and required with the indirect action to ensure a campaign has the momentum to get things changed. To the people deriding the students for doing a bit of smashing and scaring the royals that are subsidised at a greater rate per head than the students, I’d like to point out that students have done the petitioning, the lobbying, they went out and spoke with their votes, and now, because of our electoral system and the Lib Dems misguided choice, they voice was silenced. They, we, I have every right to be fucking angry, every right to take to the streets and protest, sorry if we think we should be on Parliament Square outside where people are making decisions on the country’s future students. The police may try and kettle and beat them to make protesting as unpleasant as possible, but if you think that will stop the campaign you are mistaken at just how angry your citizens are becoming, and this isn’t wanton destruction at an unfortunate restaurant in Oxford, but directed at building representing the Conservatives and the government at large and at being interned in the cold without adequate facilities. I am writing my opinions on the MET and kettling at the moment, but I am fairly certain the greatest factor in causing the public strife at the moment is their own tactics.

Students have every right to be angry, and they may have lost one battle, but with concessions, bring on the next vote on HE, and bring on the referendum so that when the people vote their voices are actually heard.

Malvina Reynolds – It Isn’t Nice.

I think you should listen to this song, and while you are at it listen to Ear to the Ground by Malvina Richards, because its ruddy brilliant.

Dec 14, 2010
Dec 5, 2010
Oh my, IC-Union Council cont.

In the previous post I made reference to IC Union Council passing policy broadly in favour of the Browne review, I’m currently writing some stuff about it and noticed an issue. People keep saying you need to read the Browne review to really understand what this is all about, however, I would say its more important to read David Willetts MP statement about the proposals, because the coalition are not forwarding the Browne review in its entirety.

For instance, while Browne suggested a total uncapping of fees with a levy on fees of greater than £6k to get some money back into the state coffers and to prevent universities just charging silly money. We all know that the proposals cap the fees at £9k, but there is no longer to be a levy on such high fees. I quote “there will be a cap, we see no need for institutions to pay back a proportion of the graduate contribution as a levy to the Exchequer, as proposed by Browne.” Instead those charging higher fees have to participate in schemes to encourage fair access to university. Imperial already does outreach, at least in medicine, and probably more so tick such boxes so might not have to change too much to be allowed the high fees.

The belief in the Higher Education Policy 2c passed by the Union states: “The levy Universities will have to pay if setting degree prices above £6000/year, incentivising them to only charge the real cost of the degree. This levy should be ring fenced to support Higher Education.”

This, combined with the passing of policy before the survey leads me to further believe the policy needs to be looked at again. While it is acceptable to come out in favour of the Browne Review or the proposals as separate entities, the bastardisation of an aspect is slightly confusing.

Dec 1, 2010

November 2010

3 posts

Up the IC Union!

Student politics is a load of bollocks, and from little experience I have sitting on committees its all a bit confusing, but at its heart it should be representing its members (ie students) and as each sabbatical has but a year in office, each one should spend the year making as much noise and trying get the most done. Essentially, each one should think of their year as going down in a big ball of flames.

This year, more than any, the union should be stamping its feet and baying for blood. Instead it does nothing, there is no central dissemination of information about any demonstrations or marches and our president has come out in favour of the Browne review. I believe his support is based on personal grounds as opposed to what the members actually want. I have some evidence for this.

A survey was carried out of the student population, it was carried out during summer vacation and opposed to being advertised aggressively, it was meekly hidden away on wesbites people don’t really use. In total 727 people completed the survey (as I was in college right through the summer, I was one of those nerds who saw it). 727 out of a student population of 13,019, so its the views of 5.6% of students and already can be said to not really be representative of what the student population thinks. The review was carried out before the Browne review had been published, at that time 49.2% of respondents had not heard of it, nonetheless some interesting things can be seen from students perception of acceptable debt and where funding should come from.

52.7% thought the government had a responsibility to fully fund the HE system, while at the same time the majority had a realistic view on funding saying students should expect to leave with some debt, and to contribute to their tuition. I think this in part is related to the fact that we have come through the system knowing we should and so its the status quo.

62.4% thought the amount you pay shouldn’t be related to your institution, Imperial as part of the Russell Group lobbied for uncapping of tuition fees and I would choke on my own tongue from surprise if they don’t go for £9,000 fees for most if not all of their courses. Imperial students do not want to pay this much, nearly 70% don’t want to pay £7,000 and 86.5% were opposed to an uncapped model, and still 68.5% felt it should be free with government funding. 

76.3% thought the system should remain the same, I am completely baffled that the Union hasn’t come out and changed its stance. It shows that the population of Imperial want free education, but at the same time are not naive and are fine with the concept of paying for tuition, just not more than we currently do.

Another question asked how much debt would be acceptable to leave university with, just 5.3% thought over than £30,00 was acceptable. As it stands a rise to £6,000 (with current Maintenance Loan amounts) would see Bachelor degree with £33grand worth of debt, add an extra £11grand for each additional year. That is a best case scenario as it stands at Imperial. Worse case (£9000 tuition) sees 4 year courses with £56000 and more for those silly enough to go for longer courses. Imperial students do not want to pay this much money yet their representatives have passed motions at council saying Imperial College Union approves of the report. Its students do not. 

Our president argues that its good because people don’t pay until they earn over £21000, the average Imperial students first job pays £25,000 and in some departments (Computer Science) its 10,000 higher.  Wow, that raised threshold will really affect the student body when they leave. There is the argument that why should non-university educated people pay for people to go to university, I counter this with that average graduate salary is £25,000 (national average) and that graduates pay their way through income tax (in many ways, an already established graduate tax [lower case]).

So, Imperial students surveyed don’t want the raise, anecdotally, the protests in Westminster have garnered the support of students who wouldn’t normally take to the streets. Its time for the Union to listen to those it represents and I think that there would be a large amount of support if the Union came out and said we’re going to march, sit in and make some noise. I’m not sure how exactly to go about forcing the Union to do something, but I was talking to some members on the council and as they voted support before the results were released, I think there needs to be another vote on this. While we twiddle our thumbs waiting for the next council meeting I think the Imperial student body needs to stop doing things as individuals or small groups and come together and make its opinions heard.

Nov 27, 2010
Sharp intake of breath.

Today in class we were watching the documentary (somewhat outdated and US-centric) Weight of the World, its okay, has some funny bits but I wouldn’t say I learnt anything new. On iplayer at the moment is a documentary on bottled water, again its not surprising, but it has some great music in the background and succinctly shows how ridiculous big corporations can be.

While the latter explicitly says multinationals are geniuses in selling people something they already have through the tap at a huge mark-up in a cut-throat industry, the former highlights how much needs to change to curb obesity, and that we must rethink how we design our cities, transport and need better integration with education and to tackle a large inequality between classes over it all. The class entered a discussion after we watched it, and we were asked to say something we had learnt from it, there were some comments about how people didn’t realise people who live in inner-city high population density areas walk more than those in the suburbs and then someone made reference to a school in Philadelphia. The school had run out of money and had to be taken over by the local authority, and that to deal with the money problems they also seized on the chance to revolutionise their canteens and exercise ethos, the food was better and with lower profits, lots of exercise and they told Coca-Cola that if they wanted to keep their vending machines in the school the fizzy drinks had to go and be replaced with fruit juice. Although drinking fruit juice isn’t the best, it was a marked improvement, local shops opening were brought onside and encouraged to market not with sweets but with healthy options. Who needs Jamie Oliver, people are doing it for themselves! Someone in my class commented how great it was that the scheme directly reached a whole school and thereby influenced the families, the number 1200 was mentioned. Then it was my turn, and I said that 1200 is pretty piss poor for a locally run school, this wasn’t a city-wide scheme, so they were reaching 1200 people out of a population of 5.8 million. Philadelphia has lots of fat kids, and to be impressive they should have been rolling out the same across the entire city, and even then, that’s piss poor when the US has a population of 300 million. I admire grass root mobilisation, but we’re talking about a public health time bomb, and I made the point I’d intended of that I thought that it would be much more effective to have some top-down legislation to get this being rolled our across the country where 25% of the population are overweight.

Now, I think public health is an important thing, and it needs to be done right, it took far too long between the time of the discovery of the link between tobacco and lung cancer and any legislation on its sales. Lung cancer is still the number one cancer killer in the UK, before the First World War, it didn’t rank in the top ten. Its a shitty disease and kills you. Obesity is strongly correlated with cardiovascular disease (eg angina, infarcts, stroke) and diabetes (number one cause of amputation), these diseases are chronic, require a lot of medical intervention and are totally preventable. I think some legislation will do some good, people will wail about freedom of choice and their civil liberties, but largely, I believe most people are apathetic about most things and just do as the law says. The fact that this legislation will be hugely beneficial to our population and society means I would hope it would be looked back on as a good thing.

I, however know that legislating comes with the problem that industry has money, huge fucking piles of money which they can use to lobby. And they lobby well, they lobby so well I wouldn’t accuse them of open bribery because they have so much resources and personnel they can simply argue so loud it silences anyone else. With this in mind I said I didn’t like the school co-operating with Coca-cola, and that I was very worried about the newly formed responsibility deal networks being dominated by food and booze industry people. This was met by silence, the academic fellow was “good point, does anyone else know what he is talking about?” No. I then explained that the new glorious government was setting up committees to work out how to deal with the countries alcohol and obesity issues was being chaired by the likes of Walkers (PepsiCo), McDonalds and the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, I pointed out these people these people have little to no interest in the public health of the nation and that they should be told what to do, not asked what they find palatable. And there it was, audible sharp intake of breath from more than one person. “I heard that” I replied.

Sorry for sounding like a dirty socialist, but I don’t believe for a moment that big company will voluntarily do what is necessary to curb its damaging impact on consumers, they just don’t give a shit. “But if consumers don’t want it they’ll have to change” people cried, no, they wont stop wanting it so long as these companies are allowed to market as aggressively as they want, and if any meaningful legislation came into pass, it would need be to world wide, because if not the companies will shrug it off and go “fine, have you’re lack of choice, the real market these days with growth is Asia and Africa, literally billions of people wanting what we want”. Others said you need industry on side or else they wont do as you say. Actually, I think you find people tend to have to obey the law and their profit margins will deal with it.

My final point is that I’m disappointed that on a global health course people don’t seem to think that this kind of thing needs to be done, and quite shocked sometimes that they all know more about sub-Saharan Africa’s problems and would be outraged if “big Pharma” were up to no good, but don’t seem to even know that the health system we’re entering into is about to be influenced by the parties doing so much harm to our future patients.

At least the academic-fellow apparently knows my name.

Nov 26, 20101 note
Fatigued.

I am so fatigued, I’m ‘green fatigued’ so can no longer be bothered arguing about the environment as while I’m not content with my own continuing efforts I’m pretty much resigned to others not doing their part and accepting its all gone to shit. I’m tired of politics, I must admit earlier this year I had a naive optimism, but the fact that the majority of the population in this country are centre-right leaning at best just disgusts me and I’m fed up with being unrepresented in parliament and knowing that all parties are essentially (and arguably forced to be) popularist and that utilitarianism is a concept which probably makes the majority of people vomit a small amount into their mouths. This fatigue is leading me to neglect union societies, union responsibilities as I don’t want to ever try and explain why the environment is worth saving, when you meet people who can’t even see personal benefits its hard to want to engage people about the bigger picture, and I’m neglecting an electoral reform campaign I’m somehow meant to be key to in my area, because I just don’t want to try and convince anyone about something I feel so passionately about when they will either not give a fuck or be plain ignorant.

I’m currently studying a BSc in Global Health which is a jazzed up title for epidemiology, which I find fascinating but I’m tired of it, mainly because there is so much evidence and ways to make the world better, but that these things are unpalatable to the general public, and therefore politicians and it just makes me fatigued even more, and I wont be surprised if the grade for today’s exam reflects my poor attendance.

The only good thing to happen to my fatigue is I bought a new seat post this week so my legs ache less at night when I cycle, and this only means my not going into school is less due to physical pain and more the crushing realisation that nothing will ever change for the better.

Nov 12, 20101 note

October 2010

2 posts

Why I don't like the housing benefit policy?

It has been announced that there is to be no more that £20k pa for housing benefit, in some ways I can see why this is a good idea, that’s a lot of money.

However, I am totally against the capping. In the last three years I have only lived in zone 2 and my rent has been over £20k a year, I even lived in an ex council flat alongside council residents and paid greater than that. I have no idea how far out of London you’d have to go to get to a lower rent, I imagine its quite far. But hey, that’s just the value of the property and all that, so why does it bother me that while I, who can just about to pay the rent, that those who cant don’t live by me. I like living in an area with a varied set of inhabitants, yes, but that’s not why. Why, because its really unfair, the people who are on housing benefit are not necessarily the feared “benefit scroungers”, but presumably the reason they are on housing benefit is because they can’t afford rent of over £20k, so they don’t have a great job, yet there are low paid jobs within zone 2 and zone 1, so the people who are about to incentivised/shifted/evicted to leave will have to still travel into the inner zones to work, this travel will eat into their already meagre wages, keeping them poorer. It gives rise to ‘poor’ areas far away, this leads to a ghettoisation of people on housing benefits, and I don’t like that, to then expect them to come in to do low paid work is just a kick in the teeth and is inherently unfair, so yeah, maybe a cap is needed in these times of austerity, but at £20,000 is far too low. 

Oct 28, 2010
A little courtesy from the powers that be.

My name is Reuben Gibbons.

I support the left of the political spectrum, due mainly to the nature of the UK’s electoral system my post code means so long as I live in my current house I will be represented by someone of the right political spectrum. I may not like this, and I know my MP and I would disagree on many things, I still expect to be represented properly. I expect this, but have come to terms that my MP will almost certainly be on the other side of any argument in the commons to the one I would want him to take, nonetheless I write quite regularly to my MP, and I get responses. I will admit when I write it is always based on the template of an organisation I’m supporting, it help’s make the main points clear and also makes sure I don’t ramble or become incoherent, likewise I am not surprised that MPs must have the same kind of template. To make the e-mails I send ‘better’ I personalise them, I make them very much about me and I try and add evidence for what I want to say, the responses I get are not so well written, they seem bland, lifeless and dismissive. I can also safely assume my MP doesn’t actually read the e-mails or write the responses, he has someone to do that, and understandably so.

However, the template replies are beginning to be slightly rude in their ‘templateness’. Because sometimes the template isn’t appropriate for the personalised letter I’ve written, the template reply wouldn’t need much editing to make it appropriate, essentially it requires either the MP or his secretary to read my e-mail, actually read the words I use, understand what I’ve said, and importantly asked, and to then delete/reword the template response, and ideally answer the question.

My MP is Greg Hands, Chelsea and Fulham, and he is PPS to the Chancelor, as such he can’t sign Early Day Motions(EDMs), I know this because I asked him to sign EDM 367 (Sustainable Livestock Bill) and he replied saying that as he was a PPS he couldn’t sign them, he didn’t explain why not and then proceeded to say he thought it was unnecessary as the government is doing enough already. Fair enough, I asked, he declined, I learnt not to ask him to sign EDMs.

Last week I wrote for him sign a petition to prevent cuts to science funding, 

Dear Greg Hands,

I hope you enjoyed your party conference and my original city. 

I am writing to you tonight to ask for your support against proposed cuts in government funding to science in the UK.

The evidence is clear that investing in research brings a range of economic and social benefits, and that severe cuts at the very moment that our competitor nations are investing more could jeopardize the future of UK science. I feel that cuts in science and engineering would be detrimental because:

  1. Investment in science and engineering skills and research yields broad and historically proven economic returns. Such investment, if made now, could drive the growth needed to secure a strong economic recovery.
  2. The Government is keen to boost confidence in the UK by making decisive cuts. But cuts in the science and engineering sectors would have the opposite effect, damaging investor confidence, reducing levels of investment and impacting the quality of higher education.
  3. UK science and engineering is already extremely efficient, nearly 30% of the UK’s GDP is produced by sectors intensive in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, and is currently anked first in the G8 for scientific papers produced as a proportion of GDP. Despite being relatively underfunded compared to other nations, the UK’s scientific disciplines produce 12% of global citations with just 1% of the population and is home to 29 of the world’s top 200 universities and three of the top ten. It is clear that UK science is already very efficient.
  4. Investment in science must be increased, or at the very least maintained,  in order for the UK to remain internationally competitive. The UK invested 1.8% of its GDP in R&D in 2007. This is short of the UK’s own target of 2.5%, and further behind the EU target of 3.8%. The new Government needs to commit to the challenging goal of at least 2.5% of GDP to be spent on R&D from all sources by 2014.The UK has an excellent track record, with four of the world’s top 30 research universities. But this excellence is threatened by rapidly increasing investment overseas, particularly in countries such as Brazil, Russia, India and China, that could grow into research giants. Indeed, the UK’s share of scientific publications fell over the last decade, while China’s quadrupled.The advantages that the UK built upon – including an early scientific and industrial base, the English language, and openness to international investors and workers – will not sustain our excellence without a strong new commitment to the future.
  5. It is important to remember that as MP for Chelsea and Fulham, your constituency contains at least 1 halls of residence used by Imperial College, and is an area where many students, including myself, and staff live and that cuts to the sector will effect both their studies and employment.

The Science is Vital coalition, along with the Campaign for Science and Engineering, are calling upon the Government to set out a supportive strategy, including public investment goals above or at least in step with economic growth. Without such investment and commitment the UK risks its international reputation, its market share of high-tech manufacturing and services, the ability to respond to urgent and long-term national scientific challenges, and the economic recovery.

I would like you to:
- sign the Science is Vital petition
- and attend a lobby in Parliament on 12 October (15.30, Committee Room 10).

I have signed the petition,  and hope to speak to you in person about this on 12 October. Furthermore I would like to remind you that you have yet to reply to my question (sent 13th September) on your opposition to the Alternative Vote and reasons for finding First Past the Post a fair way to carry out an election.

Yours sincerely, 

You’ll have to believe me when I say I heavily edited the template, observe my opening sentence, how friendly am I to a person who I disagree with, I then inserted evidence to back my point and removed points I personally didn’t feel were required, I tried to make it relevant to his constituency by mentioning Imperial College students and staff of the area. I understand that cuts have to happen, although I would prefer some sort of Keynesian approach, but I thought the argument to save science was pretty solid, its rooted in economic fact and as unpleasant as it is to say this, that’s what matters at the moment to the people making the decisions. Funding should in fact increase, it is a vibrant and productive sector and it would help the recovery as well as maintaining the UK as a centre of scientific rigour and excellence. I would also like to highlight that I didn’t ask my MP to sign any EDM, I knew he can’t. 

Dear Mr Gibbons,

Thank you for contacting me about EDM 767 and the “Science is vital” campaign. Unfortunately, as Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, I am not in a position to sign EDM.

Now here is what is getting me flustered, at no point did I mention EDM 767, I especially didn’t ask him to sign it, I asked him to sign a petition of support, which I can only assume he hasn’t done as it wasn’t mentioned at all in the letter. Essentially the letter is making a response to the cause, but not to what I wrote, to avoid this all one would have had to do is edit this initial sentence. That rubs rude to me, I made the effort to be personal, I would hope the same would be shown to me.

[…] Science IS vital, but so are a large number of other causes, and we have to balance needs and aspirations very carefully.

So vital Mr Hands felt the need to capitalise a verb, but not sign a petition. Yes other causes are important, and I wouldn’t want to see other sectors suffer for a massive increase in funding for science, I think most people would be quite happy for the funding to be kept at its current, relatively low and not on target amount. I just think this is a bit glib considering how many facts and figures I used.

I get it, my MP isn’t going to promise anything about science, or even give a whiff of support. 

Lastly, and this is what is really making me angry, is that I asked a question, twice now, and not been given a response. Greg Hands is on twitter, he tweeted he had no support for Alternative Vote, was fearful of the door it could open for Proportional Representation, and expressed support for First Past the Post. I tweeted back, and got a response saying something along the lines of “140 characters isn’t enough space to explain fully”. He tweeted these things into the public domain and I would like to know why he thinks this, I want to know his arguments, then I want to put my point across, and try and convince him otherwise. In the previous letter about EDM 367 I introduced myself by my twitter user-name, then said I was writing about both the EDM and electoral reform, his response was purely about the EDM with no mention of the other direct question. As you can see in the next e-mail I wrote reminding him of this, and still no response.

Why do I support electoral reform? Because I do not feel my views are represented in parliament. I think I have shown above that this is the case, and I know that Mr Hands is probably representing the 60% of the people who voted for him well. But don’t us other 40% matter? I want my vote and my opinion to mean something. The only way that will happen is if electoral reform is passed, in the area I live in, Mr Hands has nothing to fear in AV, he would probably still win the seat, but I want to know why he thinks any reform is bad. Why giving better representation to his constituents is unpalatable, and the lack of response is disgusting.

Either he does not read the question, or he doesn’t want to respond, in either case I currently do not feel like I am even being represented by someone I disagree with.

Oct 13, 20101 note

September 2010

5 posts

Sep 8, 2010
Play
Sep 4, 2010
Sep 4, 2010
Remember.. → open.spotify.com

Remember when Scott just defeated the twins and is going after Romana but bumps into Knives in the crowd and Anthem for Seventeen Year Old Girl is playing? I like that song.

Sep 4, 2010
I got fox shit on my new pedal.

A poo? A poo on my push bike?
You red bushy rodent, how dare you.
I built this myself, out of iron and glue
And now, a fox has done a poo
Oh, such blatant agression
From one so once hunted
I never wanted your blood
But now I must admit, I will back
Blonde Boris in his attempt to kill you
For I do so love my push bike. 

My girlfriend’s ode to the fact there is shit on my bike’s left pedal (and left shoe).

Sep 4, 2010

August 2010

3 posts

Aug 24, 2010
My legs told me it was around 40m → maps.google.co.uk

Oh, they knew.

Aug 23, 2010
Aug 19, 2010
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January 1
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June 3
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 1
  • February 5
  • March 9
  • April 9
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2010 2011 2012
  • January 3
  • February 12
  • March 11
  • April 5
  • May 5
  • June
  • July 2
  • August 2
  • September 3
  • October
  • November 5
  • December 2
2010 2011
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August 3
  • September 5
  • October 2
  • November 3
  • December 4